To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
5 thoughts on “New Points of Dispute rules”
does it really need to be in the rules, for common sense to prevail??
The rule is obsolete. Points of Dispute will now invariably be prepared in an electronic editable format. The practice of supplying copies of such documents if requested via email, dropbox or some other means is virtually universal.
The rule never did what was intended anyway. You could always copy the file onto disk in a format that couldn’t be edited and still comply with the rule.
Would that Paul were right. I still see far too many assessment bundles where the PoD and the Replies are on separate documents. Total irritation before we even begin.
i see far too many Pods in the past prepared in some sort of software that even the pentagon cant even open the bloody thing!! Come on guys who cares. Lets just get the job done.
I’ve received two sets of points of dispute in the new format via fax in the last 5 days, both defendants have thus far ignored two requests apiece to provide me with an electronic version so that I can include everything in the one document, I’m seemingly without any form of lever to get them to send them to me, other than to raise their conduct as an issue of course